Sometimes you’ll pick up a book and it hooks you enough that
you push through to the end. But
then the ending makes you say, “WHAT?
NO! That’s just wrong!”
This happened to me recently; a book I read ticked me off. I’m not going to say the title or author because I don’t
want to shame the individual.
She probably won’t ever read my blog, but I’m going to be courteous
anyway.
Anyway, the ending irritated me. I felt like the twists were not foreshadowed well enough,
and
I felt like the reason the hero gave for loving the heroine
was a total mismatch with the kind of relationship they had. For most of the book, the hero and the
heroine were at odds with each other, and there was even some question as to
whether the hero might actually be the villain. The hero stonewalled and sought to thwart the heroine every
step of the way. With that
kind of relationship, did I believe it when the hero told the heroine that he
loved her from the first moment he saw her? No! No, I
didn’t! He did not love her from the first moment he
saw her. His behavior showed none
of that. There was one scene at
the 2/3rd point when he was subtly protective, but that wasn’t
enough. There was a sequence when
they were together and told each other stories, but that was never presented in
scene, only as exposition and narration, so it never felt real to me as a
reader.
What would have been more believable is if the hero had
said, “I hated you when you came, and I was determined to fight
you, but you won me over anyway, and now I can’t imagine life without
you.” And with all the conflict between them early in their
acquaintance, the scene where they confessed their love needed a lot more
rehashing of previous events. They
needed to explain to each other when they first noticed each other as a romantic
prospect, when they first started to love each other, what they thought, what
they feared, when they doubted, etc.
That all needed to be explained in order to make the ending feel
satisfying and believable.
I also had a hard time believing that the villain was the
villain when that was revealed.
The villain was the only person who was kind to the heroine in a very
hostile social environment. The
environment stayed hostile for a long time, and the villain was friendly for a
long time. There was just one
little scene where the villain snapped a bit and let down the mask. But because of the villain’s pattern of
kind behavior, this seemed like an aberration, rather than showing true
colors. I had a hard time
believing that the villain would have the moral courage to show friendliness to
the heroine when everyone else was determined to isolate the heroine socially
for so long.
There’s a problem when you get to the end of the book and
you’re not convinced that the twists are really the truth. It means there’s been inadequate
characterization or foreshadowing.
In this case, I think it was inadequate characterization. The truth didn’t fit the larger pattern
of behavior for the character.
As you can see, when I get done with a book and I don’t like
the ending, it helps me to analyze what went wrong in it that left me
dissatisfied. It gives me a little more insight as to
what is required for a good story to work. Frequently I end up asking myself, “Does my story make that
mistake too?” And if so, that
becomes an opportunity to improve my own writing.
No comments:
Post a Comment