One of the dangers of writing dialogue is that it can be too
on-the-nose. I have a hard time
wrapping my mind around the term on-the-nose, so I want to unpack it and offer
some alternative ways of defining it.
Here is an example of dialogue taken from The Writer’s Digest article “7 Tools ofDialogue”:
“Hello, Mary.”
“Hi, Sylvia.”
“My, that’s a wonderful outfit you’re wearing.”
“Outfit? You mean this old thing?”
“Old thing! It looks practically new.”
“It’s not new, but thank you for saying so.”
“Hi, Sylvia.”
“My, that’s a wonderful outfit you’re wearing.”
“Outfit? You mean this old thing?”
“Old thing! It looks practically new.”
“It’s not new, but thank you for saying so.”
The article says there are no surprises here, and that is
true. But what is really happening
is the characters are being completely forthright and open with each
other. Questions are answered
completely and happily. Also, the
stakes of this dialogue are low to non-existent.
After all, why should we care about the wonderful outfit Mary is
wearing?
So one way to make the dialogue more interesting is to make
one of the characters evasive.
They may not want to answer questions, or they may not want to do what
they are asked to do. But they
want to be polite about it, so they come of with different ways to avoid
answering questions fully or at all.
Or they may find a way to answer directly while shocking the interrogator
so that the interrogator changes what they want.
Another way is to make the stakes of the conversation
high. What if Mary’s dress was
stolen goods, and she doesn’t want to reveal where she got it?
Another way is to make the topic an unexpected hot-button
issue for one of the characters. What
if Mary hates the dress she’s wearing, but she was forced to wear it for family
photos? What if Mary is not
someone who is comfortable wearing dresses and would much rather wear pants? How would she react to someone
commenting she looks lovely?
Another way is to give the interrogator hidden motives for
asking the questions. What
if Sylvia (the girl who is complimenting Mary’s dress) knows that Mary hates
wearing dresses, and she compliments Mary on her dress just so she can rub
Mary’s face in the fact that Mary is wearing a dress?
Yet another way is to put the dialogue in a story context that makes it more interesting. For instance, what if the above dialogue happened near the end of a story in which Mary's conflict was a very stormy relationship with Sylvia? In this case, the above dialogue might be part of a payoff the story was building toward, showing that Mary has accomplished her goal of bringing them into a peaceful coexistence. It would need more internal dialogue to heighten that effect, but it could fit fairly well.
I think you get the picture.
I think we’ve shown here that on-the-nose dialogue needs
doses of tension, evasion, emotion, and motive. Lots of this can be done in the internal dialogue of the
characters to spice it up. We’ll
imagine them circling each other (mentally), calculating how to meet their
goals, measuring and rationing the information they give each other as they
battle for ascendency, parsing each other’s words for hidden meeting, reeling
under the hidden blows of the other’s words, regrouping and recalculating for
the next round, etc.
This is words as a battle.
Conversation as conflict.
No comments:
Post a Comment